Posted 02 January 2008 - 03:27 PM
i've been comparing norman 200b and sunpak 120j. it seams that norman is better (flash duration and gn speaks for it, against it is normans battery sizes). what do you think about that?
and what about lumedynes (the 200ws ones). they are much more powerfull, but much more expensive to. the battery is also big. i dont know nothing about the flash duration and recowery time
for me flash duration, size and prize are the most important factors. what do you thing i should choose (im shooting medium format and dslr)
Posted 03 January 2008 - 01:18 PM
Posted 03 January 2008 - 02:59 PM
i'd choose sunpak because they are cheaper, but i dont know if the duration will by fast enough (mayby on a 1/2 power- but gn will decrease then and will it be enough strong to shoot on medium format ???). if somebody use the sunpak 120j please help. peace
Posted 04 January 2008 - 06:09 AM
I'd research into exactly what you need because it's not something that'll be a cheap mistake to make, whichever route you choose.
Posted 04 January 2008 - 10:43 AM
Posted 04 January 2008 - 10:55 AM
As someone on here said... buy nice or buy twice.
Look into the Lumedyne Action packs. Are you planning on using a lot of modifiers like softboxes, grids, snoots, gels, umbrellas? Its important to look at what the company has to offer you.
Posted 04 January 2008 - 02:55 PM
Posted 04 January 2008 - 03:00 PM
There are a few people on here who have shot MF with the 120J... first off the top of my head would be Jordan.
Posted 04 January 2008 - 04:05 PM
Posted 05 January 2008 - 02:23 PM
youll see how much better than any pc you ever had they were.
Unorthodox Skate Photo
svenreed - Tim Cisillino - Brett Hiltz - Stephen Denton - Jordan - ghs421 - Babyschrank - Jacob Casey - ZakZakZak - ChrisFiore - Josh l. - all about the benjamins - rts - Nick Deschamps - PatrickD - Dylan Loos - myke111